Loading plate I - 1,235,685 splats
Earth Models v0.2 · FOUNDING THESIS
-:-:- UTC
ED. 2026.06 VOL. I · ISSUE 01 EARTH MODELS / FOUNDING THESIS + TECHNICAL DEMO

A measurement layer for agriculture

Make crops measurable over time

Growers make decisions from sparse samples of a crop that changes every day. I want to turn a simple camera pass into a measurable record of what is growing, how it changes, and what is ultimately harvested.

The first test is whether repeated 3D capture, combined with greenhouse data, can improve crop registration and short-horizon harvest forecasts.

The reconstruction capability exists. The agricultural system is the experiment.

SCROLL
§ 01 PROTOTYPE
Built

The reconstruction capability already works.

Ordinary photos become an interactable 3D reconstruction you can inspect. This is the measurement tech, not the agricultural product.

Loading plate II - 346,327 splats
Technical prototype · drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
§ 02 MISSING STATE

Agriculture's missing layer: precise crop state.

Agriculture already has images, climate and harvested totals (kgs). What is missing is the link between them, and it barely exists in public data.

Today's data is fragmented: separate RGB photos, climate-sensor readings and harvested totals on a scale, with no link between them. What is missing is the connected record: the same crop tracked through time with its interventions, organ-level changes and final outcome.
Fragmented today (images · climate · harvest totals) → the missing link → one connected crop-state record
§ 03 FIRST PRODUCT

First proposed product

Continuous crop registration and harvest forecasting.

The first customer does not buy a "world model". They buy a better answer to three questions: what is on the crop now, what will be harvestable next, and where/how/why is the forecast changing.

The goal: a forecast reliable enough to plan with: sales planning, labour, packing and logistics, while reducing manual crop registration.

Camera capture of greenhouse tomato rows feeding a weekly harvestable-kilograms forecast and a per-zone maturity map.
Current load · short-horizon forecast · deviation by zone
§ 04TECHNICAL HYPOTHESIS

A longitudinal 3D/4D crop-state representation is the hypothesis.

From 3D Gaussian Splatting reconstruction of a tomato plant, through segmentation and tracking, to a semantic, parameterized plant with extracted measurements: plant height, canopy width, fruit count, fruit-size distribution, leaf angle and growth rate.
Reconstruction → semantic, parameterized plant → measurable crop state
Built

What exists

A from-scratch, state-of-the-art 3D Gaussian Splatting1 trainer, extensible for agricultural capture.

To build

What the pilot builds

Repeated capture, fruit segmentation, spatial registration, size and maturity, and climate and harvest alignment.4

To validate

What the pilot tests

Whether the 3D/4D crop state beats cheaper 2D and climate-only baselines.8

§ 05PILOT

One pilot can test the thesis.

A single, falsifiable experiment designed to show exactly where longitudinal 3D helps, and where it does not.

One crop

Indeterminate greenhouse tomato

One site

A commercial greenhouse or research facility

8-12 weeks

Repeated capture and weekly harvest outcomes

Inputs

Images, climate, irrigation and management logs

Ground truth

Harvested weight and grade, by row or zone

Baseline A

History + greenhouse climate

Baseline B

Climate + ordinary 2D imagery

Experiment

Climate + longitudinal 3D/4D crop state

Success is a measurable advantage from 3D on at least one axis: lower forecast error, more reliable counting under occlusion, or less manual registration.

The pilot answers one question: what exactly will the first cheque let us discover?

§ 06DATA FLYWHEEL

The product creates the dataset; the dataset improves the product.

The moat is not raw imagery. It is longitudinal crop data aligned with environment, interventions and real outcomes: the distribution a generalizable crop model has to learn from.

The data flywheel: capture crop state, estimate load, forecast, harvest, weigh and grade as ground truth, retrain the predictive model, and repeat.
Capture → forecast → harvest → ground truth → retrain the predictive model

This distribution is not public. Off-the-shelf models never learned it, and images alone do not contain it. Acquiring this out-of-distribution data is the means to Earth Models, and the way to own what the model will need.

The three pillars of deep learning
01

Approximation

a model expressive enough to represent the function.

02

Optimization

training that actually finds those parameters.

03

Generalization

the de facto lever is data. That is what every deployment compounds.

§ 07WHY TOMATO

Start with indeterminate greenhouse tomato.

  • 01

    Frequent labels

    Harvested repeatedly over a long cycle, producing many prediction-versus-actual events from a single crop.

  • 02

    Controlled environment

    Grown with existing climate data, so the environmental track the forecast needs is already being logged.

  • 03

    A worthwhile challenge

    Fruit is partially occluded by canopy, exactly the structural problem where 3D might earn its cost.

Strawberry remains a possible lower-occlusion validator, but tomato is the starting point.

Indeterminate greenhouse tomato: trusses of fruit at mixed maturity along a vertically trained vine.
Solanum lycopersicum · continuous harvest, occluded fruit
§ 08LONG-TERM VISION

What this could become if the first loop works.

Each rung compounds proprietary data no public model has seen.

  1. 01

    Crop measurement

    What is present now?

  2. 02

    Harvest intelligence

    What will be ready, and when?

  3. 03

    Crop dynamics

    How is growth changing?

  4. 04

    Intervention response

    How does it respond to climate and management?

  5. 05

    Plant models

    What representations transfer across cultivars, sites and crops?

  6. 06

    Earth Models

    Learned models of biological systems interacting with their environment.

Toward a learned model of plants and their environment, transferable from one greenhouse crop across crops and sites.
From one crop to a model of living systems

Earth Models is the north star, not the first product. World models, for the living world.

§ 09WHY ME

Why I am starting here.

I work on differentiable rendering, world modeling, gpu programming and machine learning systems at Electronic Arts' research Lab (SEED). I am one of few to have written a complete, state-of-the-art 3D Gaussian Splatting trainer from scratch. It is mine and soon Open Source, to extend for agricultural capture, and I own the full path from cameras and geometry to GPU deployment.

I love 3DGS, but I am attached to the crop-state problem, not to one representation. If calibrated 2D wins, the company should use it ( although I'm 99% sure that 3D will deliver stronger priors to get valuable data from :D ).

The missing complement is deep agronomy and commercial greenhouse access: the team I need to build around the technology.

§ 10PARTNER WITH US

Build the first ground-truthed crop-state pilot.

Seeking one greenhouse partner and one crop-domain collaborator for an 8-12 week tomato pilot: repeated row access, climate logs and harvested weight by zone. We report transparently where 3D helps, and where it does not.

contact@earthmodels.ag
§ ◇REFERENCES
  1. [1] Kerbl, Kopanas, Leimkühler, Drettakis. 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering. ACM TOG, 2023.
  2. [2] McMaster & Wilhelm. Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agric. For. Meteorol., 1997.
  3. [3] Min, Ye, Xiong, Chen. Computer Vision Meets Generative Models in Agriculture: Technological Advances, Challenges and Opportunities. Appl. Sci. 15(14): 7663, 2025. doi:10.3390/app15147663
  4. [4] Ojo, La, Morton, Stavness. Splanting: 3D Plant Capture with Gaussian Splatting. SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Technical Communications. doi:10.1145/3681758.3698009
  5. [5] Tabaa & Di Caro. GreenhouseSplat: A Dataset of Photorealistic Greenhouse Simulations for Mobile Robotics. arXiv:2510.01848, 2025. arxiv.org/abs/2510.01848
  6. [6] Jocher, Chaurasia, Qiu. YOLOv8 by Ultralytics. Open-source release, 2023. github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
  7. [7] Adebola, Xie, Kim, Kerr, van Marrewijk, van Vlaardingen, van Daalen, van Loo, Susa Rincon, Solowjow, van de Zedde, Goldberg. GrowSplat: Constructing Temporal Digital Twins of Plants with Gaussian Splats. arXiv:2505.10923, 2025. arxiv.org/abs/2505.10923v2
  8. [8] Odah, Houetohossou, Houndji, Glèlè Kakaï. Machine learning techniques for tomato yield prediction: A comprehensive analysis. Smart Agric. Technol. 12: 101067, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.atech.2025.101067